Court will not do anything on Ram Temple issue: Shiv Sena

                                    (Photo Courtesy: Google Image)

New Delhi, Oct 29: Shiv Sena on Monday said "the court will not do anything" on the Ayodhya issue and demanded that a Ram temple be constructed in Ayodhya."We didn't demolish Babri structure 25 years ago after asking the court. Our thousands of kar sevaks didn't sacrifice their lives after asking the court. We did not take court's permission before starting Ayodhya movement.

"We want Ram Temple in Ayodhya. We are not demanding to construct Ram Temple in Pakistan or Karachi. Our demand is to construct Ram Temple in God Ram's Ayodhya," Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut said reacting to the Supreme Court listing the hearing in the matter to January next.He said that the party chief Uddhav Thackeray would visit Ayodhya and put his point before the country over the issue.Raut said they were not bothered about the date fixed by the court for the next hearing. 

                                   (Photo Courtesy: Google Image)

 In a move that could see the Ayodhya issue not decided before the Lok Sabha elections, the Supreme Court on Monday directed the listing of the Ram Janmabhoomi title suit matter for an appropriate bench that will fix the dates in January 2019 for the hearing of a batch of petitions challenging the Allahabad High Court verdict trifurcating the disputed site.During a brief hearing, a bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice K.M. Joseph gave its decision on the petitions challenging the 2010 Allahabad High Court ruling by which the disputed site in Ayodhya was divided into three parts -- for Ram Lalla, Nirmohi Akhara and the original Muslim litigant."We have our own priorities. Whether the case will come in January, February or March, it will be for the appropriate bench to decide," CJI Gogoi said as a lawyer urged the court to decide on the dates when the hearing on challenge to the High Court judgment will take place.The listing of the matter for January could prolong the hearing in the case for a few months -- by when the country would be in election mode due to general elections due in April-May 2019.On September 27, the top court bench headed by then Chief Justice Dipak Misra, along with Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, by a 2:1 majority rejected the plea that the challenge to the 2010 verdict be heard by a bench of five judges.It was contended by the Muslim litigants before the three-judge bench headed by then Chief Justice Misra that the challenge to the 2010 verdict should be heard by a larger bench as the High court had relied on 1994 apex court judgment that said that mosque was not essential to Islam for offering Namaz prayers.Rejecting the plea for hearing by a larger five-judge bench, then Chief Justice Misra and his colleagues on September 27 directed that the matter be listed for October 29 hearing.